We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

How much sway case law holds may perhaps range by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances on the current case. To explore this concept, think about the following case law definition.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents in the boy or Female do not approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they will do if they're able to cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who is a major, the few is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by legislation.

Also, it may review an appeal of a decision for which it's got granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by The brand new Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts When the Commission cannot attain a decision.

thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed for the disposal of the moment petition on the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and private respondents and will just take care of all of the aspects of the case and assure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

As the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been achieved, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year previous boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children during the home. The boy was placed in an emergency foster home, and was later shifted all over within the foster care system.

Because of this, just citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling an individual to tell them you’ve found their shed phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-this kind of community, without actually providing them an address. Driving around the community wanting to find their phone is probably going to get more frustrating than it’s well worth.

On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf in the boy by a guardian advert litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf in the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for any dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all performing in their Work with DCFS.

Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, aiding you in understanding the intricacies of land and property regulation.

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside website our view, section 20 in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability during the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request for the appellate court.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It's also a perfectly-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.